Population data from achaeology and history
Unlike climatic data, past
demographics are difficult to reconstruct from the archaeological record. In
many periods there were no formal burials, so human remains do not survive, and
in other periods where we have cemetery data, we cannot be certain that the
buried populations reflect living populations. For instance, in the Roman
period babies were not buried in cemeteries but rather stored in the eaves of
houses or placed in enclosure ditches. Because of the difficulties of
reconstructing ancient population levels, most data within the public remit
suggest population began to increase around the Roman period.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Population_curve.svg
There is, however, one
period that is beginning to show clear changes in human fertility (and
therefore most probably population increase) – that is, the Neolithic, when
people first began to abandon a hunter-gatherer lifestyle and instead adopt
farming.
Bocquet Appel et al.
have demonstrated, on a global scale, that the transition from a hunter-gather
to farming lifestyle was accompanied by major demographic change, characterized
by an abrupt increase in immature skeletons, indicating a notable increase in
birth rates. On the basis of this evidence it would appear that farming brought
about the first major population explosion. Details of this research can be
downloaded for free here
For many researchers, such
as archaeologist Wickham-Jones (2010) and anthropologist Ingold (2000) the
transition from hunter-gather to farmer marks the start of the problems faced
by the world today. Certainly, by
comparison to low-density mobile communities, the increased population of
sedentary communities would have been more at risk to the effects of
environmental change – something that is becoming clear today.