Conclusions
Landscape history teaches us that long-term resilience, the
sustainability of communities and their economies has been based on change,
often radical reconfiguration, driven by people who understood their immediate
environments and who had the freedom and capacity to adapt, often rapidly, to
shifting circumstance. Surely one of the
greatest worries that we should all have is that it would seem that for the
first time in our history, people’s capacity to change is now denied just at
the moment when change is most needed.
Species and
environmental history teaches us that
when humans play at altering ecosystems the results are not always predictable
or desirable. They may sometimes be disastrous.
As Keith Kirby (2009, 63) states:
“We do need to be
realistic and clear as to what we are seeking from wild landscapes – is it
specific species, habitats, or natural processes; is it a feeling of
wilderness, or spiritual renewal; is it a new form of recreational experience?
They may not all be compatible; they may not all have the same level of support
both within the conservation community and the wider public”
It is to these questions
of what were are seeking to make sustainable, why and with what effect that we
turn in Chapter 8 – Heritage.